1. Facts before solution
Persons, entities, assets, residence, control rights, bank accounts, documents and objectives are separated from the desired solution.
Methodology
How a structure idea becomes a documented decision basis.
A robust structure is not created by choosing a jurisdiction first. The review starts with facts, objectives, constraints and documentation needs, then turns them into a clear decision path.
Working sequence
2. Tax and legal review path
Residence, exit tax, CFC rules, effective management, permanent establishment, withholding tax, valuation and local law are mapped.
3. Banking and documentation
Source of wealth, source of funds, beneficial ownership, structure purpose and funds flow are made explainable.
4. Implementation roadmap
Open points, required professionals, timing, documents and risk decisions are ordered before implementation.
Typical outputs
- Structure memorandum with facts, assumptions, risks and recommended next steps.
- Organisation chart and funds-flow diagram for banks and advisers.
- Risk matrix separating tax, legal, banking, governance and documentation issues.
- Document list and implementation roadmap with responsibilities.
Quality standard
- Every structure must remain explainable after the initial setup.
- The tax position, banking story and governance documents must tell the same story.
- Where local professional review is required, the review path identifies that early.
- No public client references, logos or identifiable case studies are used.