Foundation Comparison

Germany, Liechtenstein or DIFC: which foundation structure fits the objective?

Foundations and foundation-style structures serve different purposes. Germany often stands for domestic family or charitable structures, Liechtenstein for established European wealth and succession planning, and the DIFC for a modern foundation model in the Dubai and common-law context. The purpose matters more than the label.

Structures compared

Decision criteria

  • Where are founder, beneficiaries, assets and management located?
  • Should assets be bound for charitable, family, private or entrepreneurial purposes?
  • Who should control, who should benefit economically and who should be excluded?
  • Which tax consequences arise on funding, income, distributions, relocation or later change?
  • Which banking, register, transparency and documentation duties arise?

Typical risks

  • A foreign foundation-style structure does not replace a domestic tax review.
  • Control rights, special rights and beneficiary claims can change the tax analysis.
  • Asset transfers, loans and distributions need separate documentation.
  • Banks review structure purpose, origin of wealth, control rights and ongoing governance.

Outcome

  • Comparison of suitable structure types with opportunities, limits and open questions.
  • Clear recommendation which option should be developed further or rejected.
  • Document list for foundation deed, statutes, by-laws, foundation charter, council, protector and beneficiaries.
  • Coordination plan with local legal, tax and banking contacts.
Discuss comparison